I think the important generator is: being robust seems like a solution to this “generalized planning fallacy”[1], where you don’t correctly anticipate which corners should not be cut. So, even though you could theoretically excise some wasted motions by cutting pointless corners, you can’t tell which corners are pointless. Therefore, a better policy is just not cutting corners by default.
Ah, that does make the point much clearer, thanks!
Awesome. I should also note this generator is post hoc; I was (trying to) do this for a few years before I was even thinking about the planning fallacy.
Ah, that does make the point much clearer, thanks!
Awesome. I should also note this generator is post hoc; I was (trying to) do this for a few years before I was even thinking about the planning fallacy.