Thanks, that explains the 1⁄2, 1⁄6, etc. thing. So 1⁄24 is indeed next.
I still don’t get the folding thing (vs. making the picture diagonally symmetrical) very much, but I kind of get it, so I’ll leave it be.
Maybe you don’t just make the picture diagonally symmetrical because then if you would integrate over all the probabilities you would get 200% (because you represent every situation twice)?
Thanks, that explains the 1⁄2, 1⁄6, etc. thing. So 1⁄24 is indeed next.
I still don’t get the folding thing (vs. making the picture diagonally symmetrical) very much, but I kind of get it, so I’ll leave it be.
Maybe you don’t just make the picture diagonally symmetrical because then if you would integrate over all the probabilities you would get 200% (because you represent every situation twice)?