Still, only the trusted reasonable people should be able to write “site rules” articles. Otherwise there is a risk that every “Well-Kept Gardens Die By Pacifism” article will be balanced by at least three “Freedom of Speech: Why Any Downvoting Or Moderation Is Evil Censorship” articles.
I’d recommend spreading the burden of articles, to avoid the cries of “It’s a phyg!”
Karma voting could perhaps be extended with an option for “recommend for archive” or “recommend for top level post”.
Still, only the trusted reasonable people should be able to write “site rules” articles. Otherwise there is a risk that every “Well-Kept Gardens Die By Pacifism” article will be balanced by at least three “Freedom of Speech: Why Any Downvoting Or Moderation Is Evil Censorship” articles.
If you call it recommendation you can have some trusted people just go through deciding whether or not to follow them.