In definition 20 you have
h∉F(πhipa)⇒Iπlopa,πhipa(h)=hπhipa(h)N
I’m kind of confused here: what’s N, and isn’t πhipa(h) a single action? [EDIT: oops, forgot that N was nirvana]
Also, after theorem 3.2:
First, they let us freely translate between psuedocausal/acausal and causal/surcausal.
Looks like ‘causal’ and ‘acausal’ are swapped here?
Lets ponder the bestiary of decision-theory problems
“Lets” should be “Let’s”
In definition 20 you have
I’m kind of confused here: what’s N, and isn’t πhipa(h) a single action? [EDIT: oops, forgot that N was nirvana]
Also, after theorem 3.2:
Looks like ‘causal’ and ‘acausal’ are swapped here?
“Lets” should be “Let’s”