Well, I’m an intellectual non-elite, but I’ve got an opinion.
LessWrong is great. But it isn’t “general interest”. There is some very solid (and entertaining) content on rationality, but transhumanism/friendly AI and all it’s manifold implications set the tone for a good portion of everything on here.
To your proposed projects:
Isn’t that called a magazine?
LW’s jargon is part of it’s charm… and, I think, it’s effectiveness in communicating ideas without engaging the previous connotations and biases of it’s readers. Of course, it probably does interfere with LW gaining more widespread, mainstream appeal among “intellectual elites” so, to that end, get rid of it.
Generally, I think LW is awesome. But “highest quality on the internet”? Yowza. It’s a big internet and that’s a big supposition. (Is there a name for a bias where you become a bit too thrilled with your own online forum’s greatness?)
I’d say keep doing what ya’ll are doing. By their nature, online forums seem to fill relatively narrow-interest niches and I think LW does a great job of that.
LessWrong = Highest-quality-FAI-no-politics-allowed-genius-filled-online-forum. Of 2013.
Generally, I think LW is awesome. But “highest quality on the internet”? Yowza. It’s a big internet and that’s a big supposition. (Is there a name for a bias where you become a bit too thrilled with your own online forum’s greatness?)
Well, I’m an intellectual non-elite, but I’ve got an opinion.
LessWrong is great. But it isn’t “general interest”. There is some very solid (and entertaining) content on rationality, but transhumanism/friendly AI and all it’s manifold implications set the tone for a good portion of everything on here.
To your proposed projects:
Isn’t that called a magazine?
LW’s jargon is part of it’s charm… and, I think, it’s effectiveness in communicating ideas without engaging the previous connotations and biases of it’s readers. Of course, it probably does interfere with LW gaining more widespread, mainstream appeal among “intellectual elites” so, to that end, get rid of it.
Generally, I think LW is awesome. But “highest quality on the internet”? Yowza. It’s a big internet and that’s a big supposition. (Is there a name for a bias where you become a bit too thrilled with your own online forum’s greatness?)
I’d say keep doing what ya’ll are doing. By their nature, online forums seem to fill relatively narrow-interest niches and I think LW does a great job of that.
LessWrong = Highest-quality-FAI-no-politics-allowed-genius-filled-online-forum. Of 2013.
If you have suggestions I’d like to hear them.