This contradicts naive determinism: the idea that one’s action is necessarily determined by some known, computable function.
Wait. This only contradicts strawman-naive determinism. Regular naive determinism that one’s action is determined by some computable function, which need not be known. And “computable” is pretty lenient for this view—it still counts if the universe itself is the only engine which can hold the computation, which it performs in real-time.
Naive determinism ABSOLUTELY includes both being wrong and lying about your expected future actions.
(minor point—most of the text remains valid)
Wait. This only contradicts strawman-naive determinism. Regular naive determinism that one’s action is determined by some computable function, which need not be known. And “computable” is pretty lenient for this view—it still counts if the universe itself is the only engine which can hold the computation, which it performs in real-time.
Naive determinism ABSOLUTELY includes both being wrong and lying about your expected future actions.
Ok, I’ve made the text clearer that this is just one formulation of naive determinism.