I was already paying attention to Ziz prior to this.
Ziz’s ideology is already influential. I’ve been having discussions about which parts are relatively correct or not correct. This is a part that seems relatively correct and I wanted to acknowledge that.
If engagement with Zizian philosophy is outlawed, then only outlaws have access to Zizian philosophy. Antimemes are a form of camouflage. If people refuse to see what is in front of them, people can coordinate crimes in plain sight. (Doesn’t apply so much to this post, more of a general statement)
The effect you’re pointing too seems very small if it even exists, in terms of causing negative effects.
I was already paying attention to Ziz prior to this.
Ziz’s ideology is already influential. I’ve been having discussions about which parts are relatively correct or not correct. This is a part that seems relatively correct and I wanted to acknowledge that.
If engagement with Zizian philosophy is outlawed, then only outlaws have access to Zizian philosophy. Antimemes are a form of camouflage. If people refuse to see what is in front of them, people can coordinate crimes in plain sight. (Doesn’t apply so much to this post, more of a general statement)
The effect you’re pointing too seems very small if it even exists, in terms of causing negative effects.
As I promised, I have removed my strong downvote and I have now read your post. I don’t really have any particular comments, though.
I’m not enough of a decoupler that I can disregard murder.