Yes, with a summary, to avoid making people have to read the entire article to know if it’s worth their time, and to validate that you understand the content well enough to endorse it.
Maybe you’re just more accustomed to the Hacker News standards?
Edit: Didn’t mean to imply Hacker News standards are bad, just that standard practice there seems to be just posting the link and article title, while users here have a much different expectation, which you have been informed of several times and continue to violate.
What? One of the entire points of the discussion section as it exists is for posting links.
Yes, with a summary, to avoid making people have to read the entire article to know if it’s worth their time, and to validate that you understand the content well enough to endorse it.
Maybe you’re just more accustomed to the Hacker News standards?
Edit: Didn’t mean to imply Hacker News standards are bad, just that standard practice there seems to be just posting the link and article title, while users here have a much different expectation, which you have been informed of several times and continue to violate.