Do you agree that the fairest system would be to combine everyone’s utility functions and maximize them?
No, I do not. I do not think that humans have coherent utility functions. I don’t think utilities of different people can be meaningfully combined, too.
No, I do not. I do not think that humans have coherent utility functions. I don’t think utilities of different people can be meaningfully combined, too.
Ah, yes, the famous business plan of the underpants gnomes...
No, I do not. They might be best given some definitions of “best” and given some conditionals, but they are not always best regardless of anything.
What makes you think it is possible?