It’s an intersting data set but I don’t think it’s useful as a primary source.
Given that the freshest “news” in the pile is from 1977, I don’t think the term “news” is appropriate.
If you are interested in what happened 40 years ago it might be better to read more recently written history books than contemporary intelligence analysis.
It’s an intersting data set but I don’t think it’s useful as a primary source. Given that the freshest “news” in the pile is from 1977, I don’t think the term “news” is appropriate. If you are interested in what happened 40 years ago it might be better to read more recently written history books than contemporary intelligence analysis.