Thanks for your comment. I think if the document as draft, and I published it to get some valuable feedback.
In the text version of the document there is literature after each chapter, and Kanneman is there, may be not as often as he should be.
But most biases was “reinvented” by me, as well as idea to use X and Y axis for typology and timing.
It is interesting idea to add collective biases.
I am also thinking about adding a block of biases which impede scientific research, like publication bias. It will be collective biases.
My first language is Russian and I used the help of an editor to spell-check and rewrite some parts of the map.
Thanks for your comment. I think if the document as draft, and I published it to get some valuable feedback. In the text version of the document there is literature after each chapter, and Kanneman is there, may be not as often as he should be.
But most biases was “reinvented” by me, as well as idea to use X and Y axis for typology and timing. It is interesting idea to add collective biases.
I am also thinking about adding a block of biases which impede scientific research, like publication bias. It will be collective biases.
My first language is Russian and I used the help of an editor to spell-check and rewrite some parts of the map.