Note I’m not talking about moral weight here, and my point here is that all discussions about counterfactuals (especially human intuitions around counterfactuals) could in principle be executable/actually doable with enough compute and the ability to specify details, so counterfactability/counterfactual worlds isn’t special from a philosophical perspective, as it implicitly refers to other real worlds/universes.
Of course, this isn’t the only way to do so for a large class of counterfactuals/counterfactual worlds, and sometimes you can run them fully accurately on less compute/data if you can identify simplicities/abstractions that are lossless.
Note I’m not talking about moral weight here, and my point here is that all discussions about counterfactuals (especially human intuitions around counterfactuals) could in principle be executable/actually doable with enough compute and the ability to specify details, so counterfactability/counterfactual worlds isn’t special from a philosophical perspective, as it implicitly refers to other real worlds/universes.
Of course, this isn’t the only way to do so for a large class of counterfactuals/counterfactual worlds, and sometimes you can run them fully accurately on less compute/data if you can identify simplicities/abstractions that are lossless.