I think I was too underconfident to get the result that the problem did have a much larger impact on the people involved.
My comment is about the problem being a good way to go about solving the problem, not making mistakes. To put it bluntly, I was trying to understand what the “problems” were on the problem.
My problem is that having a single solution, with all of the pieces of it, is very bad for the person making the first step, and I’d feel better doing nothing than making progress. I’d consider this one to have a better solution than this one—the original solution was not a real solution, so I’d be better off if there were more of them.
If I had a single solution to the problem, I’d be willing to assign it to someone in need, regardless of how much of its original solution seemed to be applicable to the real world.
I think I was too underconfident to get the result that the problem did have a much larger impact on the people involved.
My comment is about the problem being a good way to go about solving the problem, not making mistakes. To put it bluntly, I was trying to understand what the “problems” were on the problem.
My problem is that having a single solution, with all of the pieces of it, is very bad for the person making the first step, and I’d feel better doing nothing than making progress. I’d consider this one to have a better solution than this one—the original solution was not a real solution, so I’d be better off if there were more of them.
If I had a single solution to the problem, I’d be willing to assign it to someone in need, regardless of how much of its original solution seemed to be applicable to the real world.