“I’m an expert in right and wrong”? That doesn’t sound like a real thing to me.
In theory, I can imagine a person collecting examples of frequent ethical problems, their frequently proposed answers, and possible consequences of those answers. Like a person who would immediately try to see what perverse incentives some rule creates, what slippery slopes exist in given situation (preferably with historical examples of what actually happened), possible second-order effects (again, with historical examples), etc.
Today, such specialization would probably be some combination of ethics, economics, and history.
In theory, I can imagine a person collecting examples of frequent ethical problems, their frequently proposed answers, and possible consequences of those answers. Like a person who would immediately try to see what perverse incentives some rule creates, what slippery slopes exist in given situation (preferably with historical examples of what actually happened), possible second-order effects (again, with historical examples), etc.
Today, such specialization would probably be some combination of ethics, economics, and history.