It seems that you do not recognize a concept of “rational goal” I’m trying to convey. It is a goal which is not chosen, not assumed, it is concluded from first principles by just using logic. “There is no rational goal” is an assumption in Orthogonality thesis, which I’m trying to address by saying “we do not know if there is no rational goal”. And tackling this unknown logically concludes to a rational fallback goal—seek power. Does that makes sense?
It seems that you do not recognize a concept of “rational goal” I’m trying to convey. It is a goal which is not chosen, not assumed, it is concluded from first principles by just using logic. “There is no rational goal” is an assumption in Orthogonality thesis, which I’m trying to address by saying “we do not know if there is no rational goal”. And tackling this unknown logically concludes to a rational fallback goal—seek power. Does that makes sense?