That increases other (personal) risks. However, it answers the original question—though not quite correctly, it does not quite minimize the risk of infection—if you accept increasing other risks as a price for decreasing Ebola-risk, there are (much) more dangerous places to go camping, with (much) less Ebola risk (e.g. abandoned underground salt mine). If you accept increasing other risks beyond any reasonable limits, then the answer (which you might very well get from an optimizing AI) is very simple—shoot yourself. Future risk of Ebola infection—zero :-)
By “anti-Ebola preparations” do you actually mean “minimizing your chance of getting infected”?
Take a tent and go solo camping. Somewhere up North :-)
That increases other (personal) risks. However, it answers the original question—though not quite correctly, it does not quite minimize the risk of infection—if you accept increasing other risks as a price for decreasing Ebola-risk, there are (much) more dangerous places to go camping, with (much) less Ebola risk (e.g. abandoned underground salt mine). If you accept increasing other risks beyond any reasonable limits, then the answer (which you might very well get from an optimizing AI) is very simple—shoot yourself. Future risk of Ebola infection—zero :-)
No, because as garabik noted, I don’t want to commit suicide.
Bonus points for emulating a stupid AI. Not.