Because it makes it fairly likely that something draconic will be adopted as a deterrent. For example, just one possibility that jumped into my head is to consider the mere possession of dark coin evidence of involvement in the drug trade.
The US is still somewhat a country of laws. It has courts. That means that a persecutor has a burden of proof.
It’s no good career decision to wage uncertain fights for a US government official. Any signal government official is usually just togging along the party line and grabs whatever safe opportunity he can to advance his career.
The US didn’t put anybody at HSBC into prison for washing billions of drug money. The US government is to weak, to fight those battles.
poker doesn’t have a house rake unless you are playing at a casino, all crypto-currencies do
Bitcoin does provide some economic value today. There money going into the pot because of economic reasons, even if you don’t like some of them because they are about black markets.
Hello Asset Forfeiture.
Hiding crypto currency behind crypto isn’t that hard.
The US didn’t put anybody at HSBC into prison for washing billions of drug money. The US government is to weak, to fight those battles.
It is often simultaneously true that laws are enforced too harshly against people who are mostly law-abiding but do minor illegal things, while not enforced enough against serious criminals. Law-abiding people are easier to track down and catch, less dangerous for the police to go after, more likely to have a lot to lose from fighting the government, less likely to be in a demographic that can claim discrimination, and less able to do anything useful to the police in exchange for leniency (such as naming co-conspirators).
It is often simultaneously true that laws are enforced too harshly against people who are mostly law-abiding but do minor illegal things, while not enforced enough against serious criminals.
Using a crypto-currency is not something that’s easy to persecute. Standing in front of a jury and telling them someone should be sent to prison because he brought a dark coin is no easy sell.
Organisation such as EFF + ACLU also provide for a well funded legal defense.
Darkcoin usage isn’t something that’s easy to track down and catch if it’s hidden behind crypto.
The US is still somewhat a country of laws. It has courts. That means that a persecutor has a burden of proof. It’s no good career decision to wage uncertain fights for a US government official. Any signal government official is usually just togging along the party line and grabs whatever safe opportunity he can to advance his career.
The US didn’t put anybody at HSBC into prison for washing billions of drug money. The US government is to weak, to fight those battles.
Bitcoin does provide some economic value today. There money going into the pot because of economic reasons, even if you don’t like some of them because they are about black markets.
Hiding crypto currency behind crypto isn’t that hard.
It is often simultaneously true that laws are enforced too harshly against people who are mostly law-abiding but do minor illegal things, while not enforced enough against serious criminals. Law-abiding people are easier to track down and catch, less dangerous for the police to go after, more likely to have a lot to lose from fighting the government, less likely to be in a demographic that can claim discrimination, and less able to do anything useful to the police in exchange for leniency (such as naming co-conspirators).
Using a crypto-currency is not something that’s easy to persecute. Standing in front of a jury and telling them someone should be sent to prison because he brought a dark coin is no easy sell. Organisation such as EFF + ACLU also provide for a well funded legal defense.
Darkcoin usage isn’t something that’s easy to track down and catch if it’s hidden behind crypto.