If you split the message into 64-bit chunks, the last 6 bits of each chunk are always identical. That is, they’re either “000000” or “111111″. I don’t think there’s a third spatial dimension to the data, as chunking by n*64 doesn’t yield any substantial change in autocorrelation for n > 1.
Oh, and the 7th-last bit (index [57]) is always the opposite of the final six bits. I interpret this as either being due to some cellular automaton rule, or that the “aliens” have given us six redundant bits in order to help us figure out the 64-bit reading frame.
If you split the message into 64-bit chunks, the last 6 bits of each chunk are always identical. That is, they’re either “000000” or “111111″. I don’t think there’s a third spatial dimension to the data, as chunking by n*64 doesn’t yield any substantial change in autocorrelation for n > 1.
Oh, and the 7th-last bit (index [57]) is always the opposite of the final six bits. I interpret this as either being due to some cellular automaton rule, or that the “aliens” have given us six redundant bits in order to help us figure out the 64-bit reading frame.