David_Kristoffersson comments on MIRI’s technical research agenda

[David_Kristoffersson]

So you disagree with the premise of the orthogonality thesis. Then you know a central concept to probe to understand the arguments put forth here. For example, check out Stuart’s Armstrong’s paper: General purpose intelligence: arguing the Orthogonality thesis

[Mark_Friedenbach]

I explained in my post how the orthogonality thesis as argued by Stuart Armstrong et al presents a false choice. His argument is flawed.

Then you know a central concept to probe to understand the arguments put forth here.

I’m sorry I’m having trouble parsing what you are saying here...