Certainly, I’d agree that Trump would be a failure (nay, THE failure) if the world ends in nuclear fire. It sort of seems like at that point we don’t need itemized lists though?
I don’t buy that presidents can affect the economy in a big enough way to tank it. At least, none that I’ve seen have done so. Grading a prez on what the econ does feels like grading him on the weather.
I wouldn’t have a problem with deporting all illegal immigrants. All Muslims, on the other hand, would involve deporting a lot of Americans. I’m not sure where you’d deport them too? But, sure, I’ll certainly agree that deporting American citizens would be grounds for failure.
Certainly, I’d agree that Trump would be a failure (nay, THE failure) if the world ends in nuclear fire. It sort of seems like at that point we don’t need itemized lists though?
I don’t buy that presidents can affect the economy in a big enough way to tank it. At least, none that I’ve seen have done so. Grading a prez on what the econ does feels like grading him on the weather.
I wouldn’t have a problem with deporting all illegal immigrants. All Muslims, on the other hand, would involve deporting a lot of Americans. I’m not sure where you’d deport them too? But, sure, I’ll certainly agree that deporting American citizens would be grounds for failure.
I was exaggerating a bit—but I am sure you agree that your criteria are too few and unimportant to judge a whole presidency...