@George Weinberg: ”...from an evolutionary perspective: why do we have a sense that we ought to do what is right as opposed to what society wants us to do?”
In other words, why don’t humans function as mindless drones serving the “greater good” of their society? Like ants or bees? Well, if you were an ant or a bee, even one capable of speculating on evolutionary theory, you wouldn’t ask that question, but rather its obverse. ;-)
Peter Watts wrote an entertaining bit of fiction, Blindsight on a similar question, but to ask why would evolution do X rather than Y, imputes an inappropriate teleology.
Otherwise, if you were asking as to the relative merits of X versus Y, I think the most powerful answer would hinge on the importance of diversity at multiple levels for robust adaptability, rather than highest degree of adaptation.
And, it might help to keep in mind that biological organisms are adaptation executers, not fitness maximizers, and also that evolutionary economics favors satisficing over “optimizing.”
@George Weinberg: ”...from an evolutionary perspective: why do we have a sense that we ought to do what is right as opposed to what society wants us to do?”
In other words, why don’t humans function as mindless drones serving the “greater good” of their society? Like ants or bees? Well, if you were an ant or a bee, even one capable of speculating on evolutionary theory, you wouldn’t ask that question, but rather its obverse. ;-)
Peter Watts wrote an entertaining bit of fiction, Blindsight on a similar question, but to ask why would evolution do X rather than Y, imputes an inappropriate teleology.
Otherwise, if you were asking as to the relative merits of X versus Y, I think the most powerful answer would hinge on the importance of diversity at multiple levels for robust adaptability, rather than highest degree of adaptation.
And, it might help to keep in mind that biological organisms are adaptation executers, not fitness maximizers, and also that evolutionary economics favors satisficing over “optimizing.”