90% also seems awfully high of a fail-safe limit. Why not 70%, 50% or even less? You could just change the number and that’d fix the issue.
I also tend to lean towards the “not half as bad” camp, though a bit of that is probably contrarianism. And I do know futures that’d rank higher in my preference ordering than this. Still, it’s having a bit of a weirdtopia effect on me—not at all what I’d have imagined as an utopia at first, but strangely appealing when I think more of it… (haven’t thought about it for long enough of a time to know if that change keeps up the more I think of it)
90% also seems awfully high of a fail-safe limit. Why not 70%, 50% or even less? You could just change the number and that’d fix the issue.
I also tend to lean towards the “not half as bad” camp, though a bit of that is probably contrarianism. And I do know futures that’d rank higher in my preference ordering than this. Still, it’s having a bit of a weirdtopia effect on me—not at all what I’d have imagined as an utopia at first, but strangely appealing when I think more of it… (haven’t thought about it for long enough of a time to know if that change keeps up the more I think of it)