Sebastian Hagen: “So, you’re saying you don’t assign any of the proposed answers to the homework exercise in Dissolving the Question even a half-decent probability of being correct? That’s interesting. Please explain your reasoning.”
Because I believe things are what they are. Therefore if I introspect and see choice, then it really truly is choice.
The other article might explain it, but an explanation can not change what a thing is, it can only say why it is.
Because I believe things are what they are. Therefore if I introspect and see choice, then it really truly is choice. The other article might explain it, but an explanation can not change what a thing is, it can only say why it is.
An example of mind projection fallacy so pure, even I could recognise it. Ian believes “he believes things are what they are”. If Ian actually believed things are what they are, he would possess unobtainable level of rationality and we would do well to use him as an oracle. In reality, Ian believes things are what they seem to be (to him), which is understandable, but far less impressive.
Sebastian Hagen: “So, you’re saying you don’t assign any of the proposed answers to the homework exercise in Dissolving the Question even a half-decent probability of being correct? That’s interesting. Please explain your reasoning.”
Because I believe things are what they are. Therefore if I introspect and see choice, then it really truly is choice. The other article might explain it, but an explanation can not change what a thing is, it can only say why it is.
An example of mind projection fallacy so pure, even I could recognise it. Ian believes “he believes things are what they are”. If Ian actually believed things are what they are, he would possess unobtainable level of rationality and we would do well to use him as an oracle. In reality, Ian believes things are what they seem to be (to him), which is understandable, but far less impressive.