I don’t think so, but I’m not sure I understand the relevance, but what I’m objecting to is the word ‘exists’. Why not stick with what is observable, namely that the computer halts, or doesn’t halt?
I don’t think so, but I’m not sure I understand the relevance, but what I’m objecting to is the word ‘exists’.
Why not stick with what is observable, namely that the computer halts, or doesn’t halt?
This is a universal counterargument against saying that anything besides what we are currently observing exists.
This is a universal counterargument against saying that anything besides what we are currently observing exists.