Is there a reason you put it that way, rather than “be the person who ignores the bystander effect, especially when the costs are low and/or a beneficial action is clear”? Obviously one doesn’t want to start to act like an underpowered superhero, but it sounds like there’s more to your thinking than that.
I prefer to use more detailed analysis and consultation rather than a precomputed rough-and-ready heuristic like that in high-cost and uncertain situations, since the expected value of deliberation increases.
Is there a reason you put it that way, rather than “be the person who ignores the bystander effect, especially when the costs are low and/or a beneficial action is clear”? Obviously one doesn’t want to start to act like an underpowered superhero, but it sounds like there’s more to your thinking than that.
I prefer to use more detailed analysis and consultation rather than a precomputed rough-and-ready heuristic like that in high-cost and uncertain situations, since the expected value of deliberation increases.
That makes sense, thanks.