Multiple reasons: one paper does not science make, this is a very political topic, the paper is highly likely to be wrong, and the title is sensationalist. Downvoting due to poor quality.
I dunno, i trust russian science in metullurgy, geo, and astrophys. They use different baseline models in all those fields, but get good results too.
If he has found a cycle, and has a model, and is testable,seems like valid science, even if conclusions are wrong.
There is a lot of study on irradiance lately, but it started really picking up on 9/11. When there were no planes flying, some folks decided to use the sky as a baseline because of the lack of contrails, and atmo moisture.
Also, while not an X-risk, if you get to cram 9 billion folks into 34d north and south latitude, where there is the least infrastructure, it seems a civilization transformational effect. Makes a lot of difference in whether we put funds into coastline stabilization and dikes too.
All breakthru science comes down to one paper, or at least one scientist...
I wonder why the downvotes, although it is a quite off-topic.
Multiple reasons: one paper does not science make, this is a very political topic, the paper is highly likely to be wrong, and the title is sensationalist. Downvoting due to poor quality.
I dunno, i trust russian science in metullurgy, geo, and astrophys. They use different baseline models in all those fields, but get good results too.
If he has found a cycle, and has a model, and is testable,seems like valid science, even if conclusions are wrong.
There is a lot of study on irradiance lately, but it started really picking up on 9/11. When there were no planes flying, some folks decided to use the sky as a baseline because of the lack of contrails, and atmo moisture.
Also, while not an X-risk, if you get to cram 9 billion folks into 34d north and south latitude, where there is the least infrastructure, it seems a civilization transformational effect. Makes a lot of difference in whether we put funds into coastline stabilization and dikes too.
All breakthru science comes down to one paper, or at least one scientist...