However, I ask that you imagine it from the perspective of a small village.
It’s fairly well known that, in some villages, everyone is responsible for raising the children, not just the parents who conceived them. Over time, this process might evolve and grow, as populations evolve and grow, into the modern day version I’ve depicted.
In this latest version of the system, you’re still allowed to keep in touch with the children you’ve conceived (and the wives you’ve had); it’s just that someone else from your village is raising them right now.
And this seems weird (which is the point), but not when you consider that this system didn’t come about overnight, but grew from something that made a lot more sense when the population was smaller.
It’s fairly well known that, in some villages, everyone is responsible for raising the children, not just the parents who conceived them. Over time, this process might evolve and grow, as populations evolve and grow, into the modern day version I’ve depicted.
I think this is stretching the reality of the situation a fair bit. In societies with very strong and consistent social norms, in communities where everybody more or less knows everybody (less than the Dunbar number), anybody can discipline children who are misbehaving. The children still have a mother and a home, and they know who that is and where it is. This will be much weaker in societies that aren’t so much about the nuclear family.
I can’t see any plausible mechanism to get a society with apartments and suburbs doing this though. (Meaning such a society would not develop such living arrangements, and such living arrangements would rapidly destroy such a social arrangement)
It’s well written. You may have inspired me to write my own weirdtopia.
I hear you—and I don’t disagree.
However, I ask that you imagine it from the perspective of a small village.
It’s fairly well known that, in some villages, everyone is responsible for raising the children, not just the parents who conceived them. Over time, this process might evolve and grow, as populations evolve and grow, into the modern day version I’ve depicted.
In this latest version of the system, you’re still allowed to keep in touch with the children you’ve conceived (and the wives you’ve had); it’s just that someone else from your village is raising them right now.
And this seems weird (which is the point), but not when you consider that this system didn’t come about overnight, but grew from something that made a lot more sense when the population was smaller.
Does that make any sense?
I think this is stretching the reality of the situation a fair bit. In societies with very strong and consistent social norms, in communities where everybody more or less knows everybody (less than the Dunbar number), anybody can discipline children who are misbehaving. The children still have a mother and a home, and they know who that is and where it is. This will be much weaker in societies that aren’t so much about the nuclear family.
I can’t see any plausible mechanism to get a society with apartments and suburbs doing this though. (Meaning such a society would not develop such living arrangements, and such living arrangements would rapidly destroy such a social arrangement)
It’s well written. You may have inspired me to write my own weirdtopia.