Wow, too big an inferential distance Phil. No idea what you are tallking about here “what we think of today as individuality, will correspond to information in the future.”
Would you mind giving a few more details? Curiosity striking...
I’ve been lurking for a while, and this is my first post, but:
Would you mind giving far fewer details? Consciously imposed conjunction-aversion striking...
FTFY. Instead of asking for a single detailed story, we should ask for many simple alternative stories, no?
Obviously, this doesn’t countermand your complaint about inferential distance, which I totally agree with.
Still waiting for OP to deliver...
It’s probably just something stupid like he thinks humans will upload on computers and he thinks he knows how future society-analogues will function.
Wow, too big an inferential distance Phil. No idea what you are tallking about here “what we think of today as individuality, will correspond to information in the future.”
Would you mind giving a few more details? Curiosity striking...
I’ve been lurking for a while, and this is my first post, but:
FTFY. Instead of asking for a single detailed story, we should ask for many simple alternative stories, no?
Obviously, this doesn’t countermand your complaint about inferential distance, which I totally agree with.
Still waiting for OP to deliver...
It’s probably just something stupid like he thinks humans will upload on computers and he thinks he knows how future society-analogues will function.