Perhaps an Epistemic Status marker would be useful, because I don’t actually feel like I have it nailed down as much as my declarative sentences might convey.
Community Capital could ALSO be the resources that the community itself has. Or it could be an interconnected network of social capital. It could be like a bank where you put resources into the community-as-a-whole, trusting that the community will be willing to pay you back somehow.
Am I conflating two or more ideas into a single term where I shouldn’t be? I don’t know!
Putting it in the post makes it sound like a Decision Has Been Reached, whereas leaving it as a comment makes it feel like A Discussion Topic Has Been Opened.
I think this is important enough to include in the post. I actually think in this case it’d be reasonable to list it first (as a sort of tldr)
Perhaps an Epistemic Status marker would be useful, because I don’t actually feel like I have it nailed down as much as my declarative sentences might convey.
Community Capital could ALSO be the resources that the community itself has. Or it could be an interconnected network of social capital. It could be like a bank where you put resources into the community-as-a-whole, trusting that the community will be willing to pay you back somehow.
Am I conflating two or more ideas into a single term where I shouldn’t be? I don’t know!
Putting it in the post makes it sound like a Decision Has Been Reached, whereas leaving it as a comment makes it feel like A Discussion Topic Has Been Opened.
Ah, makes sense. Upvoted for reasonable-application-of-epistemic-humility. :)
I like “Community Capital” as a generic term that could encompass a lot of things, and maybe having more specific terms for more specific things.