Hi! Thank you very much for taking the time to write such a considered response to my ramble of a comment.
Your first question is a hard one to express in text. Instead, I’ll try hard to write a list of requirements for a situation to generate that feeling for me. Then you might be able to image a scenario that meets the requirements and get a similar feeling?
Requirements:
I must deeply care about the core idea of the subject. For example, I deeply care about animals not coming to harm, or about the world being destroyed by ASI.
I must disagree with the way it is being protested. For example, the use of loudspeakers, or shouting. Seeming angry gives a sense of irrationality, even if the idea itself is rational.
I have only seen this in twitter feed context
I am already scared of the reaction my employer, family, or friends would have if I expressed the idea. For example, I’m afraid when I have to tell a waiter at a restaurant that I’m vegan, because it is a “weird” idea. “Weird” defined above.
What I’ve seen:
Again, just on twitter
Extremely small protest groups reminds me of all the antivax or 5G protests I’ve seen irl
Loudspeakers and yelling
Leaders on loudspeakers addressing individual open AI employees from outside of gates. In what seems to be a threatening tone. While not necessarily being threatening in context.
Protestors not taking the inferential distance into account. Which I assume would lead to a confused public. Or individuals presuming the protestors are Luddites.
Thank you again for your reply. I enjoyed having to make this as explicit as possible. Hopefully it helps make the feeling I have clearer.
And thanks you for doing something. I’m not doing anything. I think something is better than nothing.
I sympathise with your feelings around veganism—I too feel a bit awkward saying the V word in some contexts. Some of those feelings are probably down to an internalised veganphobia that I can’t shake off despite having been vegan for 4 years. I’m not sure how relevant the vegan/animal rights analogy is to AI safety. As mentioned elsewhere in this thread, Pause is already a popular idea, veganism is not. That probably gives pause advocates some leeway to be bit more annoying.
When trying to change the world, you need to make a trade-off between annoyingness/publicity and obscurity/respectability.
On one extreme, you never mention your issue unless asked. No one listens to you.
On the other extreme, you scream your issue into people’s faces in Times Square whilst covered in your own faeces and stream everything on YouTube. No one takes you seriously.
There’s a sweet spot somewhere in the middle of the two.
Although, of course, the details can always be improved, so I appreciate your thoughts. My hunch is that we’re probably at around about the right level of annoyingness. (although my personal preference to avoid being seen as weird may bias me against adopting more annoying tactics—even if they have higher expected value).
Hi! Thank you very much for taking the time to write such a considered response to my ramble of a comment.
Your first question is a hard one to express in text. Instead, I’ll try hard to write a list of requirements for a situation to generate that feeling for me. Then you might be able to image a scenario that meets the requirements and get a similar feeling?
Requirements:
I must deeply care about the core idea of the subject. For example, I deeply care about animals not coming to harm, or about the world being destroyed by ASI.
I must disagree with the way it is being protested. For example, the use of loudspeakers, or shouting. Seeming angry gives a sense of irrationality, even if the idea itself is rational.
I have only seen this in twitter feed context
I am already scared of the reaction my employer, family, or friends would have if I expressed the idea. For example, I’m afraid when I have to tell a waiter at a restaurant that I’m vegan, because it is a “weird” idea. “Weird” defined above.
What I’ve seen:
Again, just on twitter
Extremely small protest groups reminds me of all the antivax or 5G protests I’ve seen irl
Loudspeakers and yelling
Leaders on loudspeakers addressing individual open AI employees from outside of gates. In what seems to be a threatening tone. While not necessarily being threatening in context.
Protestors not taking the inferential distance into account. Which I assume would lead to a confused public. Or individuals presuming the protestors are Luddites.
Thank you again for your reply. I enjoyed having to make this as explicit as possible. Hopefully it helps make the feeling I have clearer.
And thanks you for doing something. I’m not doing anything. I think something is better than nothing.
Thanks for explaining more.
I sympathise with your feelings around veganism—I too feel a bit awkward saying the V word in some contexts. Some of those feelings are probably down to an internalised veganphobia that I can’t shake off despite having been vegan for 4 years. I’m not sure how relevant the vegan/animal rights analogy is to AI safety. As mentioned elsewhere in this thread, Pause is already a popular idea, veganism is not. That probably gives pause advocates some leeway to be bit more annoying.
When trying to change the world, you need to make a trade-off between annoyingness/publicity and obscurity/respectability.
On one extreme, you never mention your issue unless asked. No one listens to you.
On the other extreme, you scream your issue into people’s faces in Times Square whilst covered in your own faeces and stream everything on YouTube. No one takes you seriously.
There’s a sweet spot somewhere in the middle of the two.
All of the activities that PauseAI engages in are seen by the public as acceptable forms of protest.
Although, of course, the details can always be improved, so I appreciate your thoughts. My hunch is that we’re probably at around about the right level of annoyingness. (although my personal preference to avoid being seen as weird may bias me against adopting more annoying tactics—even if they have higher expected value).