What if we do some neuroscience to characterize how the whole system works, and some philosophy to characterize some of what is valuable about this thing built from neurons
Hidden in the phrases “do some neuroscience” and “some philosophy” are hard problems. What reason do you have for believing that either of them is an easier problem than creating a brain simulation that third parties will find convincing?
Hidden in the phrases “do some neuroscience” and “some philosophy” are hard problems. What reason do you have for believing that either of them is an easier problem than creating a brain simulation that third parties will find convincing?