Whatās the type signature of a proposition here?
experience ā experience
Can there be multiple incompatible propositions that predict the same experiences, and how does your approach deal with them? In particular, what if they only predict the same experiences within some range of observation, but diverge outside of that? What if you canāt get outside, or donāt get outside, of the range?
That seems fine. Consistency is often useful, but itās not always. Sometimes completeness is better at the expense of consistency.
How does it deal with things like collider bias? If Nassim Taleb filters for people with high g factor (due to job + interests) and for people who understand long tails (due to his strong opinions on long tails), his experience might become that there is a negative correlation between intelligence and understanding long tails. Would it then be ātrueā āfor himā that thereās a tradeoff between g and understanding long tails, even if g is positively correlated with understanding long tails in more representative experiences?
Since experience is subjective and Iām implicitly here talking about subjective probability (this is LessWrong; no frequentists allowed š), then of course truth becomes subjective, but of course only because āsubjectiveā is kind of meaningless because thereās no such thing as objectivity anyway except as we infer there to be some things that are so common among the things we classify in our experience to be reports of others experience to believe that maybe thereās some stuff out there that is the same for all of us.
experience ā experience
That seems fine. Consistency is often useful, but itās not always. Sometimes completeness is better at the expense of consistency.
Since experience is subjective and Iām implicitly here talking about subjective probability (this is LessWrong; no frequentists allowed š), then of course truth becomes subjective, but of course only because āsubjectiveā is kind of meaningless because thereās no such thing as objectivity anyway except as we infer there to be some things that are so common among the things we classify in our experience to be reports of others experience to believe that maybe thereās some stuff out there that is the same for all of us.