I can’t identify any clear claims in this. Is it a malthusian argument (sure there are more people, but they’re less happy, so it would be better to have stayed or go back to a previous equilibrium (better, that is (singing) for the people who are still alive)?
I can’t identify any clear claims in this. Is it a malthusian argument (sure there are more people, but they’re less happy, so it would be better to have stayed or go back to a previous equilibrium (better, that is (singing) for the people who are still alive)?