I can try. It’s someone who doesn’t understand your objection, and doesn’t seem to understand why you think it’s important that they understand it. (In stronger cases, they don’t even understand that they don’t understand it.) This generally feels like they are dodging the point of disagreement every way you bring it up, like it’s foreign to their entire worldview.
Thanks, that helps, but I don’t suppose you could break down, “doesn’t seem to understand why you think it’s important that they understand it”.
How are they acting? Are they going, “Man, you’re worried about AI? Clearly you are crazy!” or are they like, “Clearly, a super-intelligent AI would also be much more morally developed than any human, so there’s no issue whatsoever”.
If it is the second, what is the issue? Is it that they are completely convinced of their own perspective or is it that they don’t understand that you might want to challenge that claim or is it something else?
I can try.
It’s someone who doesn’t understand your objection, and doesn’t seem to understand why you think it’s important that they understand it. (In stronger cases, they don’t even understand that they don’t understand it.) This generally feels like they are dodging the point of disagreement every way you bring it up, like it’s foreign to their entire worldview.
Thanks, that helps, but I don’t suppose you could break down, “doesn’t seem to understand why you think it’s important that they understand it”.
How are they acting? Are they going, “Man, you’re worried about AI? Clearly you are crazy!” or are they like, “Clearly, a super-intelligent AI would also be much more morally developed than any human, so there’s no issue whatsoever”.
If it is the second, what is the issue? Is it that they are completely convinced of their own perspective or is it that they don’t understand that you might want to challenge that claim or is it something else?
Any of those could count.