The law of the excluded middle is a fallacy. And that’s what it is to say that there’s nothing between “standards of proof strict enough for a court of law” and “not believing anything we didn’t see”.
Also, I suspect she would change her tune about innocent until proven guilty if she was being accused of a serious crime, whether in a court of law or not.
The law of the excluded middle is a fallacy. And that’s what it is to say that there’s nothing between “standards of proof strict enough for a court of law” and “not believing anything we didn’t see”.
Also, I suspect she would change her tune about innocent until proven guilty if she was being accused of a serious crime, whether in a court of law or not.