Oh, I’m pretty sure I know the reason why, namely one objection is high status in your RL social circle and the other isn’t. I just decided to ask on the off chance you had an actual rational reason.
Ok. Then because apparently you have no ability to model other humans who disagree with you whatsoever, let’s discuss a bunch of different reasons:
0) You confuse at a fundamental level status issues with genuine disagreement about values. There’s this common temptation to use certain frameworks to force everything into and status is a fun one. (Although incidentally, I’m curious that you would use such LW specific terminology as a relatively new user. Just wondering, did you have a prior LW account?) I don’t particularly agree with people who favor for example a larger military but I wouldn’t dismiss a call for increasing military spending as a pure status issue, any more than I would dismiss people here who are concerned about a hard-take off in a matter of seconds as pure status (even as I assign it a low probability).
1) Many Christians are perfectly fine with gay marriage. See data here. So many fewer would people would have an issue.
2) There’s a lot of gay fanfic out there already, and young people are the primary readers. Since young people already strongly support gay rights by many metrics, see e.g. here, that means even fewer people would have an objection.
3) Two throw away comments are not the same as overarching themes.
4) The primary problem here isn’t just alienating feminists. There’s a problem of alienating women in general who aren’t necessarily feminist, and writing the best possible fanfic one can that gets people interested in rationality. If the lesson comes across as “you can be rational, only not as heroic” that’s not exactly great, is it? Note that about half the human population is female and moreover that the fan fiction community is disproportionately women. Role models that match peoples expectations matter.
5) Let’s say counter to fact that I disagreed with Eliezer about attitudes towards gays. That would still be very different, because he would have made a conscious decision to put text in that reflected the authors intent. In that case, I might spend time with him arguing on that specific issue. But that’s not what is going on here, the problem is in part that these are in fact values which in some forms Eliezer agrees with. So pointing out “hey, this value you say you care about isn’t being well served by what you’ve done here” is very different.
There’s a problem of alienating women in general who aren’t necessarily feminist, and writing the best possible fanfic one can that gets people interested in rationality.
Clearly, Comrade Yudkowsky has deviated from the Party line and thus his latest opus might not be fully suitable for agitation and propaganda due to insufficient ideological purity. He was seduced by the sirens’ lure of the so-called “art” and forgot that his purpose is to provide finely-honed tools for plowing the seeds of the Correct Thinking into the muck of the public consciousness. The insidious sexist contamination will sabotage the efforts to force open and pierce the minds of the potential revolutionaries with the massive tool of enlightenment that HPMOR was designed to be!
And that just will not do. So after a suitable re-education the tool will need to be reforged, the book rewritten to properly reflect the Correct Guidelines, reinforce the Revolutionary Rules, and resist the rot of the reactionary regime. To work, Comrade Yudkowsky!
This is the third time I’ve seen a heavily downvoted comment by you suddenly receive a spur of upvotes. Once is an anomaly, twice is coincidence, but thrice...
There have been multiple people who have noticed similar jumps in karma on comments which are to put it, right-wing. Most of the jumps seem to occur during the late night hours by US time. The person who seems to have benefit the most from them is advancedatheist, and at least three people now other than you have noticed this pattern.
Yeah, I intentionally didn’t phrase my comment in an accusing fashion for just that reason. For the record, I don’t think you have a sockpuppet army either, but the sockpuppet fan theory seems plausible. Note that the grandparent comment was downvoted despite being a merely factual observation, which is mild evidence in favor of that hypothesis. (On the other hand, if it really is one person wielding sockpuppet accounts, it should have gotten more downvotes than that, so eh.) We’ll see if this one gets downvoted as well; if it does, that should be additional evidence.
No. And I’ll leave you to figure out why. It isn’t very complicated.
Oh, I’m pretty sure I know the reason why, namely one objection is high status in your RL social circle and the other isn’t. I just decided to ask on the off chance you had an actual rational reason.
Ok. Then because apparently you have no ability to model other humans who disagree with you whatsoever, let’s discuss a bunch of different reasons:
0) You confuse at a fundamental level status issues with genuine disagreement about values. There’s this common temptation to use certain frameworks to force everything into and status is a fun one. (Although incidentally, I’m curious that you would use such LW specific terminology as a relatively new user. Just wondering, did you have a prior LW account?) I don’t particularly agree with people who favor for example a larger military but I wouldn’t dismiss a call for increasing military spending as a pure status issue, any more than I would dismiss people here who are concerned about a hard-take off in a matter of seconds as pure status (even as I assign it a low probability).
1) Many Christians are perfectly fine with gay marriage. See data here. So many fewer would people would have an issue.
2) There’s a lot of gay fanfic out there already, and young people are the primary readers. Since young people already strongly support gay rights by many metrics, see e.g. here, that means even fewer people would have an objection.
3) Two throw away comments are not the same as overarching themes.
4) The primary problem here isn’t just alienating feminists. There’s a problem of alienating women in general who aren’t necessarily feminist, and writing the best possible fanfic one can that gets people interested in rationality. If the lesson comes across as “you can be rational, only not as heroic” that’s not exactly great, is it? Note that about half the human population is female and moreover that the fan fiction community is disproportionately women. Role models that match peoples expectations matter.
5) Let’s say counter to fact that I disagreed with Eliezer about attitudes towards gays. That would still be very different, because he would have made a conscious decision to put text in that reflected the authors intent. In that case, I might spend time with him arguing on that specific issue. But that’s not what is going on here, the problem is in part that these are in fact values which in some forms Eliezer agrees with. So pointing out “hey, this value you say you care about isn’t being well served by what you’ve done here” is very different.
If you think the treatment of Hermione would alienate non-feminist women, you probably haven’t met any.
Clearly, Comrade Yudkowsky has deviated from the Party line and thus his latest opus might not be fully suitable for agitation and propaganda due to insufficient ideological purity. He was seduced by the sirens’ lure of the so-called “art” and forgot that his purpose is to provide finely-honed tools for plowing the seeds of the Correct Thinking into the muck of the public consciousness. The insidious sexist contamination will sabotage the efforts to force open and pierce the minds of the potential revolutionaries with the massive tool of enlightenment that HPMOR was designed to be!
And that just will not do. So after a suitable re-education the tool will need to be reforged, the book rewritten to properly reflect the Correct Guidelines, reinforce the Revolutionary Rules, and resist the rot of the reactionary regime. To work, Comrade Yudkowsky!
This is the third time I’ve seen a heavily downvoted comment by you suddenly receive a spur of upvotes. Once is an anomaly, twice is coincidence, but thrice...
I notice that I am confused.
There have been multiple people who have noticed similar jumps in karma on comments which are to put it, right-wing. Most of the jumps seem to occur during the late night hours by US time. The person who seems to have benefit the most from them is advancedatheist, and at least three people now other than you have noticed this pattern.
I don’t have a sockpuppet army, but I guess it’s possible that I have sockpuppet fans :-/
I don’t pay much attention to karma, anyway.
Yeah, I intentionally didn’t phrase my comment in an accusing fashion for just that reason. For the record, I don’t think you have a sockpuppet army either, but the sockpuppet fan theory seems plausible. Note that the grandparent comment was downvoted despite being a merely factual observation, which is mild evidence in favor of that hypothesis. (On the other hand, if it really is one person wielding sockpuppet accounts, it should have gotten more downvotes than that, so eh.) We’ll see if this one gets downvoted as well; if it does, that should be additional evidence.