First of all, yes it was. Second of all, Brin’s critique is based on literary tropes, not logic. If it’s obvious that Voldemort were referring to the train, then the train wouldn’t exactly be a prime target, would it.
Brin’s response to the anonymous “troll” speaks to his arrogance.
Oh Brin reacts like that to everyone with slightly different ideas. That’s nothing though, it actually seems to get personal when it’s different ideas about shape of the future in particular. That is particularly amusing to watch.
Ugh… That’s such a painful read I had to stop in the middle. Seriously, how is it rational for Harry to be insulting V in English? Even if V somehow does not take offense, one of his Death Eaters will. I know I felt like Adava Kadavra-ing the stupid brat who was pretending to be HJPEV in this...
http://davidbrin.blogspot.com/2015/03/a-quick-informal-post-on-yudkowskys.html
I think “stupid” is a little strong, personally. But I like the canon ending better.
Brin seems to equate ‘rational’ with ‘non-violent’. They’re not always the same thing.
Oh. Boy.
First of all, yes it was. Second of all, Brin’s critique is based on literary tropes, not logic. If it’s obvious that Voldemort were referring to the train, then the train wouldn’t exactly be a prime target, would it.
Brin’s response to the anonymous “troll” speaks to his arrogance.
Oh Brin reacts like that to everyone with slightly different ideas. That’s nothing though, it actually seems to get personal when it’s different ideas about shape of the future in particular. That is particularly amusing to watch.
Ugh… That’s such a painful read I had to stop in the middle. Seriously, how is it rational for Harry to be insulting V in English? Even if V somehow does not take offense, one of his Death Eaters will. I know I felt like Adava Kadavra-ing the stupid brat who was pretending to be HJPEV in this...
I just read it, and stupid is precisely what it is.