For example, [for] an updateless agent that always [“]one-boxes[“] in Newcomb’s, … it kind of doesn’t make sense to ask what that agent would have scored if that agent had two-boxed.
An updateless agent could (always) two-box.
The agent has code. It can only do what the code says. If the code will make it one box, there was a sense in which it never could have two-boxed.
But if the code will make it two box, there was a sense in which it never could have one-boxed.
That’s true also
An updateless agent could (always) two-box.
The agent has code. It can only do what the code says. If the code will make it one box, there was a sense in which it never could have two-boxed.
But if the code will make it two box, there was a sense in which it never could have one-boxed.
That’s true also