The actual developments of society during this period were determined, not by a battle of conflicting ideals, but by the contrast between an existing state of affairs and that one ideal of a possible future society which the socialists alone held up before the public. Very few of the other programs which offered themselves provided genuine alternatives. Most of them were mere compromises or half-way houses between the more extreme types of socialism and the existing order. All that was needed to make almost any socialist proposal appear reasonable to these “judicious” minds who were constitutionally convinced that the truth must always lie in the middle between the extremes, was for someone to advocate a sufficiently more extreme proposal. There seemed to exist only one direction in which we could move, and the only question seemed to be how fast and how far the movement should proceed.
FA Hayek, Intellectuals and Socialism. The warning against the golden mean fallacy is useful but standard, what I like best about this quote is that it brought to my attention the importance of imagination in political reforms. I think this implies we’ll get more and better thinking at the margins of policy if there are many different views about policy’s grand goals.
FA Hayek, Intellectuals and Socialism. The warning against the golden mean fallacy is useful but standard, what I like best about this quote is that it brought to my attention the importance of imagination in political reforms. I think this implies we’ll get more and better thinking at the margins of policy if there are many different views about policy’s grand goals.