To me a core difference between what you are doing and what Scott is doing is that Scott adds empiric backing to the claims he makes and doesn’t just stay at the level of a narrative.
When it comes to making claims in sensitive topics, it’s important to back up claims with citations and you skip that part by staying with the analogy level.
To me a core difference between what you are doing and what Scott is doing is that Scott adds empiric backing to the claims he makes and doesn’t just stay at the level of a narrative.
When it comes to making claims in sensitive topics, it’s important to back up claims with citations and you skip that part by staying with the analogy level.