The review mentioned in the post didn’t, although I’ve only looked at 2 studies on the dose-response relationship.
Edit: Actually, the review mentioned in the post didn’t seem to really test the shape of the dose-response relationship, I think they just assumed mortality risk had an inverse linear relationship with the natural log with the amount of exercise.
I think they just assumed mortality risk had an inverse linear relationship with the natural log with the amount of exercise.
Yeah, the table just gives linear estimates, but all of them do say more exercise is better, I think.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
The review mentioned in the post didn’t, although I’ve only looked at 2 studies on the dose-response relationship.
Edit: Actually, the review mentioned in the post didn’t seem to really test the shape of the dose-response relationship, I think they just assumed mortality risk had an inverse linear relationship with the natural log with the amount of exercise.
Yeah, the table just gives linear estimates, but all of them do say more exercise is better, I think.