Searle’s views have nothing to do with attributing novel properties to fundamental particles. They are more to do with identifying mental properties with higher-levle physical
properties, which are themselves irreducible in a sense (but also reducible in another sense).
Searle’s views have nothing to do with attributing novel properties to fundamental particles. They are more to do with identifying mental properties with higher-levle physical properties, which are themselves irreducible in a sense (but also reducible in another sense).
That’s confusing. What senses?
See the link I gave to start with.