There is an idea that programming languages don’t get to make everything easy, they get to choose some things to make easy and some to make hard (following a loose invocation of the Pigeonhole Principle here).
You want a programming language to decide to make useful things easy and useless things hard.
This is why you would expect “Frame Control” to be useful in a “good” organization. A good organization should use a frame that encourages good things and discourages bad things. A neutral frame is harder to fight the good frame from than a “good” frame!
I’d like to analogize this to a Turing Tarpit.
There is an idea that programming languages don’t get to make everything easy, they get to choose some things to make easy and some to make hard (following a loose invocation of the Pigeonhole Principle here).
You want a programming language to decide to make useful things easy and useless things hard.
This is why you would expect “Frame Control” to be useful in a “good” organization. A good organization should use a frame that encourages good things and discourages bad things. A neutral frame is harder to fight the good frame from than a “good” frame!