I don’t find these replies very responsive. Are you trying to understand what I’m getting at, or just writing local replies to a selection of my points? This is not the first time I’ve tried to write some substantial explanation and gotten not much engagement from you (IMO).
Oh, I understand what you are getting at. I just think that you’re wrong.
I’m writing local replies because fisking walls of text gets tedious very very quickly. There is no point in debating secondary effects when it’s pretty clear that the source disagreement is deeper.
I’m going to end the discussion now, unless you object. I’m willing to consider objections.
I’m stopping for a variety of reasons, some of which I talked about previously like your discussion limitations like about references. I think you don’t understand and aren’t willing to do what it takes to understand.
I don’t find these replies very responsive. Are you trying to understand what I’m getting at, or just writing local replies to a selection of my points? This is not the first time I’ve tried to write some substantial explanation and gotten not much engagement from you (IMO).
Oh, I understand what you are getting at. I just think that you’re wrong.
I’m writing local replies because fisking walls of text gets tedious very very quickly. There is no point in debating secondary effects when it’s pretty clear that the source disagreement is deeper.
I’m going to end the discussion now, unless you object. I’m willing to consider objections.
I’m stopping for a variety of reasons, some of which I talked about previously like your discussion limitations like about references. I think you don’t understand and aren’t willing to do what it takes to understand.
If we stop and you later want to get these issues addressed, you would be welcome to post to the FI forum: http://fallibleideas.com/discussion-info
s/understand/be convinced/g and I’ll agree :-)
Was a fun ride!