If circular justification has some non zero level of validity, then you might as well use it. But it’s not clear that it has non zero validity.
My response here is along the lines of Pascal’s Wager, if it has no validity, then nothing has validity since everything is circular, so we may as well assume validity. But of course that is circularly justified as well
If circular justification has some non zero level of validity, then you might as well use it. But it’s not clear that it has non zero validity.
My response here is along the lines of Pascal’s Wager, if it has no validity, then nothing has validity since everything is circular, so we may as well assume validity. But of course that is circularly justified as well