I took “spiritual” to mean in this context that you don’t believe in ontologically basic mental entities, but still embrace feelings of wonder, majesty, euphoria, etc. typically associated with religions when contemplating/experiencing the natural world.
Do you not have a preference for low/high redistribution of wealth because you haven’t studied enough economics, or because you have studied economics and haven’t found a satisfying answer? (Alternatively, trying to answer this one question might just not be worth your time. If that’s the case, I’d leave it blank. Or if you’re otherwise choosing between two positions, flip a coin)
I took “spiritual” to mean in this context that you don’t believe in ontologically basic mental entities, but still embrace feelings of wonder, majesty, euphoria, etc. typically associated with religions when contemplating/experiencing the natural world.
Notice that other people answering my question had different interpretations. I left it blank.
Do you not have a preference for low/high redistribution of wealth because you haven’t studied enough economics, or because you have studied economics and haven’t found a satisfying answer?
Because I haven’t studied economics beyond the Wikipedia level, and systems with large numbers of humans involved are really, really complicated. Why so many democratic citizens feel qualified to intuit their way to an opinion is beyond me.
Because I haven’t studied economics beyond the Wikipedia level, and systems with large numbers of humans involved are really, really complicated.
If learning about economics is something worthwhile for you, then I recommend picking up a good macroeconomics textbook and working through it. A good 101 textbook will outline simple but useful models that can help us understand the economy. (This is like how statistical mechanics can help us understand thermodynamic systems without knowing information about each individual particle.)
Alternatively, there should be open online courses from MIT, Harvard, etc. if that is more your style.
I took “spiritual” to mean in this context that you don’t believe in ontologically basic mental entities, but still embrace feelings of wonder, majesty, euphoria, etc. typically associated with religions when contemplating/experiencing the natural world.
Do you not have a preference for low/high redistribution of wealth because you haven’t studied enough economics, or because you have studied economics and haven’t found a satisfying answer? (Alternatively, trying to answer this one question might just not be worth your time. If that’s the case, I’d leave it blank. Or if you’re otherwise choosing between two positions, flip a coin)
Notice that other people answering my question had different interpretations. I left it blank.
Because I haven’t studied economics beyond the Wikipedia level, and systems with large numbers of humans involved are really, really complicated. Why so many democratic citizens feel qualified to intuit their way to an opinion is beyond me.
Systematic human irrationality?
If learning about economics is something worthwhile for you, then I recommend picking up a good macroeconomics textbook and working through it. A good 101 textbook will outline simple but useful models that can help us understand the economy. (This is like how statistical mechanics can help us understand thermodynamic systems without knowing information about each individual particle.)
Alternatively, there should be open online courses from MIT, Harvard, etc. if that is more your style.