Five wikiprojects rely on this article, but it is C-class on Wikipedia scale;
Topic seems quite important for people. If someone not knowing how to make decisions stumbles upon the article, the first image they see… is a flowchart, which can scare non-programmists away.
This seems like a much better target for spreading rationalism. The other listed articles all seem quite detailed and far from the central rationalist project. Decision-making seems like a more likely on-ramp.
I’m less interested in spreading rationalism per se and more in teaching people about rationality. The other articles are very strongly+closely related to rationality; I chose them since they’re articles describing key concepts in rational choice.
This seems true, thanks for your editing on the related pages.
Trying to collect & link the relevant pages:
Dutch book theorems
Money pump
Von Neumann-Morgenstern utility theorem
Utility
Rational Choice Cheory
Decision Theory
Causal Decision Theory
Evidential Decision Theory
Functional Decision Theory
Cox’s Theorem
Discounting
Hyperbolic discounting
Dynamic inconsistency
Time preference
There is also article Decision-making.
Importance arguments:
Five wikiprojects rely on this article, but it is C-class on Wikipedia scale;
Topic seems quite important for people. If someone not knowing how to make decisions stumbles upon the article, the first image they see… is a flowchart, which can scare non-programmists away.
This seems like a much better target for spreading rationalism. The other listed articles all seem quite detailed and far from the central rationalist project. Decision-making seems like a more likely on-ramp.
I’m less interested in spreading rationalism per se and more in teaching people about rationality. The other articles are very strongly+closely related to rationality; I chose them since they’re articles describing key concepts in rational choice.
That’s fine, but it’s a pretty specific preference, so your claims that this shows that rationalists aren’t even trying seem pretty questionable.