Yeah, agreed :) I mentioned ω−1 existing as a surreal in the original comment, though more in passing than epsilon. I guess the name Norklet more than anything made me think to mention epsilon—it has a kinda infinitesimal ring to it. But agreed that ω−1 is a way better analog.
ω-1 does exist as a surreal and is way better direct analog for Norklet
Yeah, agreed :) I mentioned ω−1 existing as a surreal in the original comment, though more in passing than epsilon. I guess the name Norklet more than anything made me think to mention epsilon—it has a kinda infinitesimal ring to it. But agreed that ω−1 is a way better analog.