In general the term isn’t important to many of the people that Scott put under that label when he wrote his map.
http://www.ribbonfarm.com/ is still alive and well. David Chapman also still writes.
That was my starting point too, but I noticed that most new content linked there specifically about PR seems to have been written pre-2015. If those authors still write, I get the impression that they are not writing about PR anymore. That makes me suspect that postrationalism was never a ‘thing’.
Is post-rationalism dead? I’m following some trails and the most updated material is at least three years old.
If so, good riddance?
If I put the phrase into Google I find http://thefutureprimaeval.net/postrationalism/ that was written in 2015 as one of the results, so the phrase got used more recently than three years ago.
In general the term isn’t important to many of the people that Scott put under that label when he wrote his map. http://www.ribbonfarm.com/ is still alive and well. David Chapman also still writes.
That was my starting point too, but I noticed that most new content linked there specifically about PR seems to have been written pre-2015. If those authors still write, I get the impression that they are not writing about PR anymore.
That makes me suspect that postrationalism was never a ‘thing’.
Scott used the term when he draw his map and a few people thought that it describes a cluster but most of the involved people don’t care for the term.
It’s similar to a term like Darwinism that wasn’t primarily about self-labeling.