You still need some assumptions, like contradictions indicating falsehood, but that’s not very contentious.
Contentiousness is irrelevant to the line of argumentation I’m making (based on Chisholm). No matter how obvious something is, it’s still an assumption if not justified.
You still need some assumptions, like contradictions indicating falsehood, but that’s not very contentious.
Contentiousness is irrelevant to the line of argumentation I’m making (based on Chisholm). No matter how obvious something is, it’s still an assumption if not justified.